Of errors that derive in horrors

Hans Blix, a Swedish of 74 years, was head of inspectors of the Nations United in Iraq and days back she reiterated what she had expressed weeks before the White House decided to undertake its preventive war against Saddam Hussein and thus to free to the one planet of its axes of badly. It had said that the arsenals of Saddam, vulgar fanfarrón, abounded in rifles with the times with Buffalo Bill, but that lacked equipments of massive destruction and chemical engendros destined to propagate plagues.

At the beginning of this month it insisted with the same and that induced to civil employees of George Walker Bush to slide a sagacious, incontrastable retort: "Bah, what importance has what vejete says that homosexual".

Blix took four tenth from second to retrucar to them that they were mother children promiscua - called bastards and who would more be worth to them to recognize that they had committed a serious error.

Voracious reyerta opened to a sore purulenta in the body of the North American governmental credibility, infected by the supposition of which Washington magnified the danger which it implied that tyrant slapdash one, to who either, for worse, winks of complicity with the partisans of Al-Qaeda could not endilgar him to it, numen of the fundamentalist terrorism.

Humanum est

They were mistaken, it seems, and that contingency is not surprising. The history of the humanity is an interminable sequel of errors, perhaps initiated the day in which the man of the caverns decided to have breakfast with yuyo toxic and happened to better life. "Something will have fallen to him badly", could suspect some relative, perhaps first in deducing that all vegetarian diet is not healthful.

In year 2136 before Christ, a Chinese emperor commanded to behead to Hsi Won and Ho Xian, palace astronomers, because they did not notice to him that a winged dragoon tried to eat the Sun, when in fact it had happened an eclipse, first of which fehaciente testimony is had. Cristóbal Columbus died in 1506 convinced of to have made foot in the Indians, without nobody found out it that it had discovered a new continent.

In 1512, the Pope Julio II severely reproached to Miguel Angel the error of to have painted without navel the Adam of the Sistine Chapel. "But, what sense has that winding nudosidad in the belly of the first man, not been born of woman", it investigated the artist, yet respect, without its repairs prospered. That Adam and others of Rafael had to incorporate folds epidérmico.

These few examples be enough to colegir that the benign errors and the malicious and premeditaded ambiguities lay out the human memory and victims received themselves in bulk. In Iraq a concise telegram of excuses to be sorry was sufficient that a stupid intelligent missile, directed to a quarter, fell by error in a maternity.

The Georges Duhamel, thinker without waste, member of the French Academy from 1935 to their death, in 1966, noticed that the data manipulation to justify an error is more perverse than the origin deceit, since usually it derives in horror. Its book Confession of midnight includes this reflection: "It happens, sometimes, that the error is mistaken", an assertion that would perhaps subscribe vejete Blix.