Brake in Deputies to the plan against the tax evasion

They will reduce or reject you raise them in the monotribute and they will not approve the association illicit

The plan antievasion announced by the Government will not leave unharmed the Congress. The legislators of the pro-government block said yesterday to the Pink House who will reduce - and perhaps they annul the increase proposed in the quotas of the monotribute and will reject the creation of a specific figure of illicit association for the tributary evasion, in addition to some smaller adjustments to the official project.

The debate will begin the next week in the Commission of Budget and Property - where the projects were turned -, and in the commissions of Penal Legislation and Finances. But to coordinate the strategy, the holders of the justicialistas blocks of Deputies, Jose Maria Diaz Bancalari, and of the Senate, Miguel Angel Pichetto, prevén an encounter with the minister of Economy, Roberto Lavagna.

After meeting with president Néstor Kirchner one remembered that the discussion of the reform will be delayed at least until the next week "by an express order of not opening another front of conflict, while (the Camera of) Delegated it debates the intervention of the PAMI and the political judgment to Nazareno (Julio)", commented to the NATION a source near Diaz Bancalari. "In addition, the project as well as is is not going to leave", anticipated.

Lavagna discarded to alter the project. "Of no way there will be changes. The modification of the regime of the monotribute is a small point in the context of the modification impelled for the system ", said. But for the Ministry of Economy and the Federal Administration of Ingresos Pu'blicos (AFIP) the possible delay of the debate and adjustments avoided its civil employees to them to have to remodelar its proposal.

It was even suspended to a meeting between Lavagna and the legislators of the PJ anticipated for yesterday, to 17. And the holder of the Commission of Budget and Property, Carlos Snopek, did not move of Jujuy, of where Monday will return. Even so, the block of the PJ communicated that it guarantees the official intention to harness the fight against the fiscal evasion and to limit the manoeuvre margins between and within the taxes. But they reject part of the small letter of the plan.

"the tributary administration analyzes itself For the first time, is spoken of how administering the taxes that already exist, instead of creating new. But evidently there are precise complaints ", they said to the NATION Rodolfo Frigeri, to title of the Commission of Finances and vowel of the one of Budget.

"the creation of a figure of illicit association for the evasion or the responsibility in the invoices apócrifas does not run, nor is given the conditions to approve an increase in the quotas of the monotribute when of 1.300.000 possible contributors pay less than 300,000, in addition of which it lacks to promote a greater fiscal decentralization", it enumerated.

If the deputies even approved without greater changes the project, the Senate would not guarantee a good one for happening. "the reform of the monotribute is quite dangerous because if the quotas are increased, it is paid less and falls the fiscal collection. It is necessary to see how that tax will reform really, in addition to the pressures and the complaints that the lawyers and the accountants by the figure of the illicit association will raise. Who will want to sign a balance or to be receiver of a company in those conditions ", it investigated the senator Oscar Lamberto, president of the Commission of Economy.

"the impression is that the reform was originated within the AFIP, not by its tributaristas, but by the inspectors who decided to look for short cuts to find what they do not obtain by the normal route. Not I say that measures in general are bad, but that we must to evaluate if it will generate effects hoped not to cause what ended up generating Machinea (Jose Luis), that demolished its government ", said.

The federal administrator of Income Public, Alberto Abbot, explained that the changes in the monotribute respond to that "in most of the cases there is an inadequate location" of the contributors of the category that corresponds to them, but insisted whereupon "there will be no increases" for those who less they pay.

"the monotribute became a tax where in most of the cases there is an inadequate location in the category that corresponds. "Many of the monotributistas in general are people whom it has to pay his tax to the gains", it affirmed. And when defending the increase of the previsual contributions left a door opened for the legislators open: "It is a proposal that is going to have to be treated in the Congress".

With the collaboration of Laura Serra